If Tragedy Strikes
Your support and contributions will enable us to meet our goals and fund our mission.
At Conservative Women for Freedom, our mission is to champion the principles of individual liberty and limited government by advocating for the passage of Amendment 4 in Florida. We believe that every woman in Florida should have the right to make personal decisions free from unnecessary government interference. Our grassroots campaign is dedicated to empowering women, fostering community engagement, and upholding the values of our founders. By supporting Amendment 4, we aim to ensure that the voices of Florida's republican women are heard, their rights protected, and their freedom preserved. Together, we will build a brighter, freer future for our daughters if tragedy strikes.
We are Conservative Women for Freedom, a dedicated group of local Republican women committed to safeguarding the rights and futures of our daughters and granddaughters. United by a shared concern for the well-being and freedoms of the next generation, we believe in the core values of individual liberty and limited government. Our mission is to advocate for Amendment 4 and protect personal freedoms and ensure that our loved ones have the right to make their own choices, especially in times of crisis.
We are here to educate our fellow Republican women about the current 6-week abortion ban in Florida and its far-reaching implications. Recognizing that this is not a black and white issue, we aim to highlight the significant government interference in personal decisions that this ban represents. Our goal is to foster an understanding of Amendment 4, which seeks to protect individual liberties and ensure that women retain the right to make informed choices about their own lives. Through education and advocacy, we strive to empower women with the knowledge they need to safeguard their rights and those of their daughters and granddaughters.
The Senate bill (SB300) reads: "At the time the woman schedules or arrives for her appointment to obtain the abortion, she must provide a copy of a restraining order, police report, medical record, or other court order or documentation providing evidence that she is obtaining the termination of pregnancy because she is a victim of rape or
The Senate bill (SB300) reads: "At the time the woman schedules or arrives for her appointment to obtain the abortion, she must provide a copy of a restraining order, police report, medical record, or other court order or documentation providing evidence that she is obtaining the termination of pregnancy because she is a victim of rape or incest. If the woman is a minor, the physician must report the incident of rape or incest to the central abuse hotline as required by s. 39.201."
In Florida, it is well documented that survivors are often afraid to report sexual violence to the police due to fear of retaliation and the belief that law enforcement would not or could not help. It is estimated that only 21% of sexual assaults are reported to law enforcement. Under the current ban, there are exceptions for rape and incest. Though created with good intentions, this isn't a black-and-white issue. Even for survivors who do report to law enforcement, Florida’s abortion laws do not make clear exactly what information needs to be provided to ensure the abortion is legal. Additionally, the survivor must have the rape verified by three separate physicians in order to obtain an abortion. These reporting requirements place barriers in the way of survivors seeking abortion care in the state.
Florida's abortion laws specify that care for ectopic pregnancies and pregnancy loss is not criminalized. However, while these provisions allow for the removal of a dead fetus or embryo, they generally do not cover miscarriage care. This means that pregnant individuals who are actively miscarrying may be denied care if there is still dete
Florida's abortion laws specify that care for ectopic pregnancies and pregnancy loss is not criminalized. However, while these provisions allow for the removal of a dead fetus or embryo, they generally do not cover miscarriage care. This means that pregnant individuals who are actively miscarrying may be denied care if there is still detectable fetal cardiac activity.
For example, if a pregnant woman in Florida went to the hospital after experiencing sharp pain and bleeding, she might be informed that her fetus had likely stopped growing weeks prior, as its size did not correspond to the length of her pregnancy, and that it had very faint cardiac activity. Despite the pain and blood loss, she could be denied the regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol commonly prescribed to patients who are miscarrying. This regimen ensures that the pregnancy is safely expelled from the body in a timely manner, reducing the risk of sepsis and infection. Instead, she might have to wait for the miscarriage to progress without medical intervention, increasing her medical risk.
In Florida, where abortion bans do not clarify that miscarriage care is not criminalized – even when there is still detectable cardiac activity – pregnant individuals may not be able to receive care to manage their pregnancy loss unless and until it becomes a medical emergency.
In Florida, abortion bans include exceptions for lethal fetal anomalies, typically limited to those anomalies that would result in the death of the baby at birth or shortly after. These exceptions are often poorly defined and limited in the statutes. Florida does not provide a comprehensive list of conditions that fall under this category
In Florida, abortion bans include exceptions for lethal fetal anomalies, typically limited to those anomalies that would result in the death of the baby at birth or shortly after. These exceptions are often poorly defined and limited in the statutes. Florida does not provide a comprehensive list of conditions that fall under this category, leading to ambiguity in the application of the exception.
The criteria for these exceptions are generally vague, specifying that any condition expected to result in a very short life expectancy might qualify. However, the narrow limits of this exception are problematic, as they may not cover other common conditions, such as Tay-Sachs disease, which result in death early in childhood. This lack of clarity and comprehensiveness in the statutes poses significant challenges for those seeking abortions under the fetal anomaly exception in Florida.
The initiative would provide a constitutional right to abortion before fetal viability (estimated to be around 24 weeks) or when necessary to protect the patient's health, as determined by the patient's healthcare provider
The following language would be added to the state constitution: "Except as provided in Article X, Section 22, no law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider."
The initiative would not change the state legislature's authority to enact a law requiring the parents of a minor to be notified if their child is seeking an abortion, with exceptions that can be attained through a judicial waiver.
Your support and contributions will enable us to meet our goals and fund our mission.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.